Administrative Law

Government Decisions and Tribunals

Administrative law is a branch of public law that ensures decisions made by government officials, agencies, tribunals, and boards are lawful, fair, and reasonable. It provides a framework for accountability, protecting citizens from the arbitrary use of power by government entities. Whether addressing employment disputes, professional licensing, regulatory compliance, or human rights claims, administrative law plays a crucial role in maintaining order and justice within governmental processes. By setting out the procedures that governmental bodies must follow, administrative law ensures transparency and fairness in public decision-making, allowing for checks and balances against potential misuse of authority.

When Administrative Law Affects You

Administrative law can impact various aspects of your personal and professional life. Here are common scenarios where administrative law plays a significant role:

Navigating Regulatory Compliance: Ensuring that businesses and individuals comply with various regulations set by government agencies can involve administrative law, especially when penalties or corrective actions are required.

Challenging a Denial of a Professional License: If your application for a professional license is denied, administrative law provides the framework to appeal the decision, ensuring the process was fair and compliant with existing laws.

Appealing a Workers’ Compensation Decision: Disagreements over workers’ compensation benefits can be resolved through administrative appeals, providing a pathway to secure the benefits you’re entitled to.

Fighting Unfair Treatment by a Government Agency: Whether it’s regarding social services, taxation, or regulatory compliance, administrative law offers avenues to contest unfair actions and seek redress.

Disputing Property Zoning Decisions: Local government zoning decisions that affect property use can be challenged through administrative procedures, protecting your property rights and investment.

Seeking Redress for Discrimination in a Public Service Setting: If you face discrimination in areas like education, employment, or housing, administrative law helps you seek justice and remedy through established legal mechanisms.

You may need a lawyer if:

  • You Believe a Government Agency Has Made an Unfair Decision: Legal expertise can help you assess the fairness and legality of the decision, and guide you through the process of seeking a judicial review or appeal.
  • You Want to Appeal a Denial of Workers’ Compensation Benefits: An attorney can assist in gathering evidence, presenting your case effectively, and navigating the appeals process to increase your chances of a favorable outcome.
  • You Face Discrimination from a Public Authority: Legal counsel can represent you to ensure your rights are upheld and to seek appropriate remedies through administrative law processes.
  • You Need Help Navigating Licensing or Regulatory Requirements: Lawyers can assist in understanding and complying with complex licensing laws and regulations, helping you secure your professional standing.
  • You Are Dealing with Disciplinary Action from a Professional Board: Legal representation is key in these hearings to defend against disciplinary actions and protect your livelihood.
  • You Are Involved in a Public Benefits Dispute: Whether it’s disability benefits, housing assistance, or other public benefits, administrative law can help you navigate disputes and secure the benefits you’re entitled to.
Laws Governing Administrative Law

Administrative law is shaped by various laws and regulations that define the powers and responsibilities of governmental bodies. Key legislation includes:

Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) and Similar State Laws: These laws allow the public to request access to government records, ensuring transparency and accountability in administrative actions.

Administrative Procedure Act (APA): This federal law governs the process by which federal agencies develop and issue regulations. It ensures transparency, public participation, and fairness in administrative decision-making, including rulemaking and adjudication processes.

State Administrative Statutes: In addition to the APA, each state has its own set of administrative laws that govern state agencies and their interactions with the public. For example, California’s Administrative Procedure Act mirrors the federal APA but applies to state agencies.

Local Ordinances and Regulations: Local governments enact ordinances that impact zoning, public safety, and community services. These are enforceable through administrative hearings and appeals, allowing citizens to contest local government decisions.

Professional Licensing Acts: These laws regulate the licensing and disciplinary processes for various professions, ensuring that only qualified individuals practice in fields like medicine, law, engineering, and more.

Human Rights Codes and Anti-Discrimination Laws: These statutes protect individuals from discrimination in various settings, including employment, housing, and public services, providing mechanisms for complaints and resolutions.

Key Terms in Administrative Law

A formal proceeding before an administrative tribunal where evidence is presented, and decisions are made regarding disputes or regulatory compliance.

The process of resolving a dispute or deciding a case through a formal hearing.

A request to a higher authority or tribunal to review and change the decision made by a lower administrative body.

The obligation to prove one’s case, which in administrative law often lies with the party challenging the administrative decision.

The process by which courts examine the decisions of administrative bodies to ensure they comply with the law and uphold fairness.

The principle that ensures individuals are given a fair hearing and that decisions are made without bias or favouritism.

The criteria that appellate courts use to evaluate the decisions of administrative bodies, often focusing on deference to agency expertise.

A specialized body established to settle disputes or hear cases within a particular area of law, such as immigration or employment.

Canadian Administrative Law

Overview: This case established that administrative decisions must consider fairness and procedural justice.

Significance: It set out the criteria for procedural fairness in administrative hearings, emphasizing the importance of individual circumstances in decision-making.

Overview: A pivotal case that streamlined the standard of judicial review in Canada.

Significance: It established the standards of correctness and reasonableness for reviewing administrative decisions, significantly influencing how courts evaluate administrative actions.

Overview: This case reaffirmed the importance of reasonableness as the standard of review.

Significance: It emphasized the need for administrative bodies to provide clear reasons for their decisions and clarified the role of courts in reviewing these decisions.

Overview: A foundational case recognizing the broad scope of judicial review over administrative actions.

Significance: It helped define the limits and powers of administrative bodies, including procedural fairness and substantive decision-making.

Overview: This case dealt with the regulation of harm reduction services.

Significance: The Supreme Court ruled that administrative decisions must comply with principles of fundamental justice and respect for individual rights, reinforcing the protection of rights in administrative processes.

U.S. Administrative Law

Overview: Established the “Chevron deference,” a principle where courts defer to an administrative agency’s interpretation of ambiguous statutes.

Significance: It allows agencies to interpret laws within their jurisdiction, provided their interpretations are reasonable.

Overview: Required that administrative agencies provide due process before terminating welfare benefits.

Significance: Emphasized the necessity of procedural fairness in administrative actions that significantly affect individuals’ lives.

Overview: Addressed the constitutionality of the legislative veto.

Significance: The Supreme Court ruled that the legislative veto violated the separation of powers, reinforcing the need for clear legislative authority in administrative actions.

Overview: Emphasized the importance of the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA).

Significance: Required administrative agencies to follow proper procedures, including environmental assessments, before making decisions affecting public lands.

Overview: Recognized the authority of the EPA to regulate greenhouse gas emissions under the Clean Air Act.

Significance: Affirmed the role of administrative agencies in addressing significant public issues like climate change and environmental protection.

Contact a Lawyer that specializes in Administrative Law today

Find a Lawyer